Product category:
Printing Trade Organisations - including Allied Industry Bodies
News Release from: British Retail Consortium | Subject: Duty Marks
Edited by the Printingtalk Editorial
Team on 29 July 2005
No Prosecution Over Unmarked Spirits
Bottles
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) has welcomed confirmation that retailers, who after January 2007 still have spirits on their shelves without new duty marks, will not be prosecuted.
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) has welcomed confirmation that retailers, who after January 2007 still have spirits on their shelves without new duty marks, will not be prosecuted by the UK Treasury The new duty marks on spirits regime, announced by the Chancellor in April 2004, means that from October 2006 retailers cannot accept spirits from producers that do not carry a duty mark
This article was originally published on Printingtalk on 1 Sep 2005 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
Guides Assist With New Global Standards
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) yesterday launched a set of new Guidelines for its Global Standards.
Global Standard Gets Chinese Translation
The British Retail Consortium (BRC) will be releasing a 'Chinese Simplified' translation of its Global Standard, Food and Global Standard, Food Packaging and other Packaging Materials standard.
Any unmarked stock still on shelves after January 2007 would have been illegal and so not saleable.
The BRC said that it has been working with producers, wholesalers, importers and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) over the last year, to highlight the problems with selling off such large amounts of spirits within three months and to find a workable solution to the problem.
The confirmation by the Treasury means that as long as retailers can prove that any unmarked stock was legitimately purchased before October 1 2006, it will be deemed as 'duty-paid' and therefore legal.
Retailers will still be able to sell this stock to customers post January 2007 and HMRC will have no case to prosecute.
BRC director general, Kevin Hawkins, said:" The BRC is very happy with this outcome.
It will save retailers from an administrative nightmare and substantial costs.
It will also be one less worry for retailers in the run up to Christmas 2006 and New Year 2007." He continued: "We did not want a repeat of the scenario of when tax stamps were applied to tobacco, when on introduction of that regime, retailers were given only six weeks to sell unmarked stock before it became illegal.
On that occasion, many retailers, especially smaller retailers, lost a lot of money.
For spirits this would be even more serious, given that they are higher ticket items with a slower stock turnover.".
• British Retail Consortium: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Printingtalk email newsletter
• Printingtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
